Hanashi vs Notta: Bilingual Meeting Tool Comparison
Hanashi and Notta both serve professionals who need Japanese and English meeting transcription, but they take fundamentally different approaches. Hanashi is a privacy-first, bot-free macOS app built specifically for bilingual JP/EN workflows. Notta is a multi-platform tool supporting 104 languages with cloud-based recording and a meeting bot. Here is an honest, feature-by-feature comparison to help you decide.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hanashi | Notta |
|---|---|---|
| Bot-free recording | ||
| Japanese transcription | ||
| English transcription | ||
| Bilingual JP/EN in same meeting | Partial | |
| Gijiroku (議事録) format summaries | ||
| Mobile app | ||
| Free tier | 7-day trial | Yes (limited) |
| Platform support | macOS | Web, mobile, desktop |
| Local storage | ||
| Data privacy (no AI training) | ||
| System audio capture | ||
| Auto-join meetings | No (by design) | |
| Price (monthly) | $15/mo | $13.99/mo |
| Price (annual) | $120/yr | ~$14,220/yr (¥1,185/mo) |
Verdict
Choose Hanashi if privacy matters to you, you work in bilingual Japanese-English meetings, you want bot-free recording that never disrupts your calls, and you are a macOS user. Choose Notta if you need a mobile app, multi-platform support across web and desktop, a free tier to get started, or the convenience of auto-joining meetings. Both tools handle Japanese and English transcription well, but Hanashi is purpose-built for the bilingual workflow while Notta offers broader platform reach.